Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0614820020080020221
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
2002 Volume.8 No. 2 p.221 ~ p.238
Validation of Korean Nomenclature of NOC: Focused on 260 Outcomes
Yoo Hyung-Sook

Jang In-Soon
Kim Hee-Girl
Nam Hye-Kyung
Park Yeon-Suk
Kim Ok-Hyeun
Park Hye-Ja
Hwang Yun-Young
Lee Chung-Hee
Lee Mi-Ja
Chio Eun-Hee
Lee In-Soon
Lee Sun-Hee
Yom Young-Hee
Ji Sung-Eae
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and test the validity of the standardized Korean nomenclature of 260 Nursing Outcomes Classification(NOC) developed by Johnson and Mass at University of Iowa in 2000.

Method: The four phases of the study were: (1) translation of the NOC into Koren by the Research Team, (2) nine nursing professors and nurses with various clinical backgrounds reviewed each nomenclature taking into consideration of definitions and outcome indicators. The modified Delphi method was used to determine the most appropriate nomenclature for each term, (3) 307 Clinical expert nurses more than three years field experiences were given a questionnaire to rate each Korean nomenclature using a 5 point Likert scale ranging from very inappropriate to very appropriate, and (4) final accordance of Korean Nemenclature.

Result: The term determined that 260 Korean nomenclature was appropriately named. Because the mean validity score of 260 outcomes was 3.90 and each of 260 Korean nomenclature had a score more than 3.00.

Conclusion: Korean nomenclature of NOC can be used as a standardized language of nursing result in a computerized nursing information system.
KEYWORD
nursing outcomes classification(NOC), validation, standardization,
FullTexts / Linksout information
  
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed